npz_v-v-senate-of-the-state-of-mayflower

Mayflower District Court

#npz_v-v-senate-of-the-state-of-mayflower

This is the start of #npz_v-v-senate-of-the-state-of-mayflower channel.

clerkFlow Bot2025-09-16 03:01 p.m.

New Case

npz_v v. Senate of the State of Mayflower

Case Type

habeas

Case Number

CV-450-25

clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 02:58 p.m.

clerkFlow Bot2025-09-16 03:01 p.m.

Channel Permissions Synced

Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Chancellor Cabot.

Brenda 2025-09-16 03:02 p.m.

@cabot

Docket no. CV-450-25 assigned to Lord Chancellor AlexJCabot

Brenda used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-09-16 03:02 p.m.

Case Modified

@Brenda

has added @cabot to the case channel.

Brenda used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-09-16 03:02 p.m.

Case Modified

@Brenda

has added @mantisshrimp69 to the case channel.

Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:02 p.m.

Thanks

Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-09-16 03:02 p.m.

Case Modified

@cabot

has added @meowiitten to the case channel.

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:02 p.m.

hiiiii

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:02 p.m.

>.<

Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:02 p.m.

@meowiitten

Want to say anything

Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ

@meowiitten Want to say anything

meowiitten 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.

Yeah just reassign

meowiitten 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.

Since he didn't file a complaint yet

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.

can it be oral @cabot

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.

do I even need something written

meowiitten 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.

Reassign to anyone but you as you already commented on the case(edited)

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.

I wasnt subpoenaed. That's like all there is to it

Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.

I already commented on this so it cant be me

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.

@cabot

you were commenting on it as a judge

Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.

@Kezzera

Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.

Want this

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.

when I sent it to you

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.

it was because you were a judge

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.

to adjudicate on it

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.

not to get an opinion

Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.

...

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.

I asked you to make a channel

Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:04 p.m.

Listen buddy I am radical but I'm not that radical

meowiitten 2025-09-16 03:04 p.m.

Buddy don't try to throw him under the bus

2

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:04 p.m.

You can still recuse if you want

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:04 p.m.

okay sure

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:04 p.m.

another judge is gonna take ages though

Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:04 p.m.

You a spastic too, you saw me speaking abotu this but gave me it anyway sybau @Brenda

1

Brenda 2025-09-16 03:04 p.m.

h

Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:04 p.m.

@Richostein

@Doogy

@Kezzera

Any of you want it

meowiitten 2025-09-16 03:05 p.m.

Yeah give it to richo this case will not see the light of day

meowiitten 2025-09-16 03:05 p.m.

This case file will grow mold

clerkFlow Bot2025-09-16 03:05 p.m.

Channel Permissions Synced

Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Chief Judge Kezzera.

Brenda 2025-09-16 03:05 p.m.

Reassigned to @Kezzera

meowiitten

This case file will grow mold

Richostein 2025-09-16 03:05 p.m.

WTF.

Brenda 2025-09-16 03:05 p.m.

mb

Richostein 2025-09-16 03:05 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/chenongyun-cat-%E5%A5%BD%E5%90%83-gif-27388668

Brenda used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-09-16 03:06 p.m.

Case Modified

@Brenda

has added @mantisshrimp69 to the case channel.

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:06 p.m.

@Richostein

Hi

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:06 p.m.

@Kezzera

Hi

Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:53 p.m.

aigu

Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:53 p.m.

right

Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:53 p.m.

let me make it clear

Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:53 p.m.

shit needs to be filed

Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:53 p.m.

if you don't file it we won't consider it

Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:53 p.m.

it's pretty obvious

Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:54 p.m.

in fact, we cannot even begin to review or consider any of your claims if you don't file a complaint

Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:54 p.m.

or standalone petition

Kezzera

in fact, we cannot even begin to review or consider any of your claims if you don't file a complaint

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:55 p.m.

I know

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:55 p.m.

I will

Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:56 p.m.

just tell me the jist of what's going on @mantisshrimp69

Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:56 p.m.

so i know what to expect

Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:56 p.m.

and i'll determine if this needs re-assignment or not as well

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:56 p.m.

It’ll be in the very written petition

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:56 p.m.

Your honor

Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:56 p.m.

when can i expect it?

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:57 p.m.

Prob today

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:57 p.m.

Tomorrow latest

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:57 p.m.

It’s emergency so

Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:57 p.m.

is this a time sensitive matter at all?

Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:57 p.m.

right

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:57 p.m.

They’re gonna arrest me so

Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:57 p.m.

you filed it under the habeas category so i will assume some kind of imprisonment

Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:57 p.m.

going to

or have?

Kezzera

you filed it under the habeas category so i will assume some kind of imprisonment

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 04:03 p.m.

It’s meant to be a sort of motion to quash

Kezzera 2025-09-16 04:03 p.m.

@meowiitten

you should take notice as to the above matter

mantisshrimp69

It’s meant to be a sort of motion to quash

Kezzera 2025-09-16 04:03 p.m.

i'll anticipate something

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 05:25 p.m.

@Kezzera

hello

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 05:25 p.m.

My bad my attorney is not yet here

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 05:25 p.m.

@Brenda

is my lawyer

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 05:26 p.m.

Please add

Kezzera used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-09-16 05:56 p.m.

Case Modified

@Kezzera

has added @Brenda to the case channel.

Brenda 2025-09-16 05:57 p.m.

Ah!

Brenda 2025-09-16 05:57 p.m.

Soy holy!

Brenda 2025-09-16 05:57 p.m.

@Kezzera

Ah!!!!!

Brenda 2025-09-16 05:58 p.m.

Your Honor, I will be filing our complaint soon

Brenda 2025-09-16 05:58 p.m.

We intend to seek a TRO

Kezzera 2025-09-16 05:58 p.m.

Thanks

Brenda 2025-09-16 08:59 p.m.

@Kezzera

@mantisshrimp69

1

Brenda 2025-09-16 09:00 p.m.

@Kezzera

We move for a Temporary Restraining Order enjoining enforcement of the Arrest Warrant. My client faces a credible threat of arrest in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976) ("The loss of [Constitutional] freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.") (emphasis added).(edited)

1

Brenda

@Kezzera

@mantisshrimp69

Brenda 2025-09-16 09:04 p.m.

Please excuse some of the typos (and omissions in the Parties section), this was written in a hurry due to the urgent nature of this matter.

Brenda 2025-09-16 09:21 p.m.

Pursuant to Mayf. R. Civ. P. 17(a), Plaintiff Npz_v hereby amends his Complaint once as a matter of course.

1

Brenda

Pursuant to Mayf. R. Civ. P. 17(a), Plaintiff Npz_v hereby amends his Complaint once as a matter of course.

Brenda 2025-09-17 11:39 a.m.

EXHIBITS

1

Brenda

@Kezzera We move for a Temporary Restraining Order enjoining enforcement of the Arrest Warrant. My client faces a credible threat of arrest in violation of his Fourth...(edited)

Brenda 2025-09-17 02:20 p.m.

@Kezzera

Bump

Brenda

Pursuant to Mayf. R. Civ. P. 17(a), Plaintiff Npz_v hereby amends his Complaint once as a matter of course.

Kezzera 2025-09-17 02:26 p.m.

this, TRO above and Exhibits A/B?

Kezzera

this, TRO above and Exhibits A/B?

Brenda 2025-09-17 02:27 p.m.

Yes Your Honor

Kezzera 2025-09-17 02:28 p.m.

Ok

Brenda 2025-09-17 07:39 p.m.

@Kezzera

ETA on ruling on TRO?

Kezzera 2025-09-18 12:31 a.m.

When do you need it by

Kezzera

When do you need it by

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:22 a.m.

Its emergency

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:22 a.m.

Im gonna be arrested

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:22 a.m.

And molested by a guy I dont know

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:22 a.m.

The sooner u can enjoin that the better

Kezzera

When do you need it by

Brenda 2025-09-18 09:35 a.m.

Right now would be optimal.

Brenda

@Kezzera We move for a Temporary Restraining Order enjoining enforcement of the Arrest Warrant. My client faces a credible threat of arrest in violation of his Fourth...(edited)

Kezzera 2025-09-19 02:59 p.m.

@meowiitten

considering you've been put on notice about this whole suit and you're here, do you want to be involved at all with this TRO?(edited)

Kezzera 2025-09-19 02:59 p.m.

if yes, we're scheduling a hearing today

Kezzera 2025-09-19 02:59 p.m.

otherwise i'll decide

Brenda used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-09-19 03:00 p.m.

Case Modified

@Brenda

has added @meowiitten to the case channel.

Kezzera 2025-09-19 03:00 p.m.

he didn't have perms?

Brenda 2025-09-19 03:00 p.m.

Apparently not

Kezzera 2025-09-19 03:00 p.m.

oops

Kezzera 2025-09-19 03:00 p.m.

yeah when he left the server it removed him, thought it automatically re-added

meowiitten 2025-09-19 03:06 p.m.

@Kezzera

Verbal or written response?

meowiitten 2025-09-19 03:06 p.m.

I mean I can just quickly explain why relief should be put off

meowiitten 2025-09-19 03:07 p.m.

First of all, under the fugitive disentitlement doctrine because he is yet to turn himself in and is using this lawsuit to essentially evade/delay his capture

meowiitten 2025-09-19 03:08 p.m.

Second, he is unlikely to succeed on the merits because there was, in fact, a subpoena issued that he failed to obey. Legislatures inherently have a power to compel the appearance of absent witnesses (see, e.g., Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 (1935))

meowiitten 2025-09-19 03:09 p.m.

Third, balance of equities falls against the plaintiff and this court should not enjoin the Senate from exercising its inherent contempt power to compel the attendance of a witnesses who willfully defaulted and failed to appear

meowiitten 2025-09-19 03:09 p.m.

That's all I have to say

meowiitten 2025-09-19 03:09 p.m.

@Kezzera

Brenda 2025-09-19 03:09 p.m.

@Kezzera

I'd like to respond to opposing counsel's point about "fugitive disentitlement"

meowiitten

@Kezzera Verbal or written response?

Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:50 p.m.

either

Kezzera

either

meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:50 p.m.

That is my response then I think it's straightforward

1

Brenda

@Kezzera I'd like to respond to opposing counsel's point about "fugitive disentitlement"

Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:50 p.m.

You may

meowiitten

Third, balance of equities falls against the plaintiff and this court should not enjoin the Senate from exercising its inherent contempt power to compel the attendance of a witness...

Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:51 p.m.

Plaintiff willfully failed to appear?

Kezzera

Plaintiff willfully failed to appear?

meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:52 p.m.

I mean yeah. Subpoean with time and date

meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:52 p.m.

subpoena*

Kezzera

You may

Brenda 2025-09-19 04:52 p.m.

Your Honor, this action is not barred by fugitive disentitlement for three reasons:
- 28 U.S. Code § 2466, also titled "Fugitive Disentitlement, is a Federal statute, and does not exist in Mayflower law or the common law. Federal laws have no application in the State of Mayflower unless codified by the State Senate. Mayf. Const. art. I, § 11 ("The laws of the Union of Columbia shall not be enforced by the State, unless such laws have been codified by the Legislature.")
- To be a "fugitive" under the doctrine, a person must be evading a criminal case. See, e.g., 28 U.S. Code § 2466 (c) ("otherwise evades the jurisdiction of the court in which a criminal case is pending against the person; and")
- Npz_v has not fled. In fact, in a Discord message, he made it clear to the Sergeant-at-Arms that he will submit to any arrest until the arrest warrant is judicially voided, see below:

Brenda 2025-09-19 04:52 p.m.

@Kezzera

I believe Sadoimpacto coached DonMDomers to not arrest my client, so that he may argue fugitive disentitlement

Brenda 2025-09-19 04:52 p.m.

As such, I move for sanctions and/or contempt.

meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:52 p.m.

He is evading a warrant for his arrest, fugitive disentitlement is a common law doctrine

meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:53 p.m.

As well as statutory

meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:53 p.m.

Ok pop off

meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:53 p.m.

Regardless I rest on the other prongs

Brenda 2025-09-19 04:53 p.m.

Oh, so opposing counsel is conceding?

Brenda 2025-09-19 04:53 p.m.

That was a very sheepish "Regardless"

Brenda 2025-09-19 04:53 p.m.

I'm not sure what to make of that

meowiitten

He is evading a warrant for his arrest, fugitive disentitlement is a common law doctrine

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 04:53 p.m.

Dude I asked how he wanted to arrest me 3 days ago and he’s ignoring me

Brenda 2025-09-19 04:53 p.m.

@Kezzera

mantisshrimp69

Dude I asked how he wanted to arrest me 3 days ago and he’s ignoring me

Brenda 2025-09-19 04:54 p.m.

This screams of "I was told to not arrest him by Sadoimpacto"

Brenda 2025-09-19 04:54 p.m.

Why else would the Sergeant-at-Arms refuse to arrest my client when he offered himself

mantisshrimp69

Dude I asked how he wanted to arrest me 3 days ago and he’s ignoring me

Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:54 p.m.

Allow counsel to make submissions for you(edited)

meowiitten

I mean yeah. Subpoean with time and date

Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:55 p.m.

@Brenda

@meowiitten

Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:55 p.m.

If I understood the complaint correctly, service got butchered pretty badly

Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:56 p.m.

it was sent to the wrong account

Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:56 p.m.

Was service re-attempted, or what's going on with that?(edited)

Brenda 2025-09-19 04:56 p.m.

Service was not re attempted, Your Honor

Brenda 2025-09-19 04:56 p.m.

After AnakinT0ast discovered the mishap, he called the process server a "f* retard"

Brenda 2025-09-19 04:57 p.m.

But he nonetheless refused to re-attempt service

Brenda 2025-09-19 04:57 p.m.

and has not removed the arrest warrant

meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:57 p.m.

Since npz_v has been ban evading (already DM'd discord about this), it was nearly impossible to locate the proper account @Kezzera

meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:57 p.m.

I mean emailed discord

meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:57 p.m.

Not DM'd them

meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:57 p.m.

We are not tight like that

Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:59 p.m.

How would you know he was even ban evading

Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:59 p.m.

How can you even show he was in fact evading at all from service

Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:59 p.m.

Wouldn't that require a showing that Plaintiff had knowledge that he'd face this kind of enforcement in the first place??

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:00 p.m.

@Kezzera

@meowiitten

“[N]o Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, * * *" U.S. Const. amend. XIV
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated unless by probable cause or by a Warrant issued by a Court of Law.” Mayf. Const., art X., § 8.
I would also urge this Court to take into consideration that (1) this "warrant" was not supported by an oath or affirmation by a law enforcement officer; and (2) it was not issued by a "Court of Law" under our Constitution's more rigorous protections.

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:00 p.m.

That in an of itself demonstrates likelihood of success on the merits.

Kezzera

How would you know he was even ban evading

Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:02 p.m.

@meowiitten

Kezzera

How would you know he was even ban evading

meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:02 p.m.

Because he's made 3 different accounts(edited)

meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:03 p.m.

He was banned the first time for saying something along the lines of "I want my 13 year old to send porn to another 13 year old"

meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:03 p.m.

He is on his 3rd or 4th account

meowiitten

He was banned the first time for saying something along the lines of "I want my 13 year old to send porn to another 13 year old"

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:10 p.m.

...

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:10 p.m.

@Kezzera

Alright what the fuck. I ask that the Court immediately order Sadoimpacto to show proof for this allgation, or be held in contempt

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.

I can also clarify for the record that this is patently false

meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.

Yeah sure

meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.

Video with reload please

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.

Can u link the message

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.

Where is that

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.

^^

meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.

It was deleted because you were moderated for it

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.

I wasnt tho

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:12 p.m.

Circular argument much?

meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:12 p.m.

meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:12 p.m.

This is another quote

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:12 p.m.

I did say that

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:12 p.m.

That’s a legitimate question

meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:12 p.m.

https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1274202189149114403/1415861183705251960

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:12 p.m.

I reiterate I was not moderated for anything like that

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:12 p.m.

Where’s the relevance

meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:13 p.m.

meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:13 p.m.

We got you in two different fonts lil bro(edited)

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:14 p.m.

I don’t remember ever saying that, there’s no messages about that that you can actually point to

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:15 p.m.

Okay lets just move on

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:15 p.m.

It's clearly not relevant to the merits of this case

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:15 p.m.

@Kezzera

@meowiitten

Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:24 p.m.

We're moving on

Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:24 p.m.

that's just deviating from the issue here

Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:24 p.m.

It may be a reasonable guess, but it's speculative

Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:24 p.m.

It would be on npz to reveal why he was banned

Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:24 p.m.

as he's the only one privy to it

Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:25 p.m.

Fine, he made several accounts

Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:26 p.m.

Plaintiff alleges the senator who issued it made a mistake by cursing out the server

Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:26 p.m.

Is that correct?

Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:26 p.m.

@Brenda

Kezzera

Plaintiff alleges the senator who issued it made a mistake by cursing out the server

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:27 p.m.

Well, we just point that out to show that he was aware that a mistake happened

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:28 p.m.

(otherwise he wouldn't have cursed at him, if that's what u meant)

Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:32 p.m.

We have been made aware of a warrant issued against you

Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:32 p.m.

@Brenda

Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:32 p.m.

I will not permit any of you to personally appear in Court

Kezzera

We have been made aware of a warrant issued against you

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:35 p.m.

Sorry what

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:35 p.m.

Can you elaborate

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:36 p.m.

sigh

mantisshrimp69

Sorry what

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:36 p.m.

Orangebear22 crashed out and issued an AW against everyone

Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:37 p.m.

Consequently this court is void of any power to deal with any affair in light of the martial law

Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:37 p.m.

Run.

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:38 p.m.

BRO

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:38 p.m.

Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:38 p.m.

We return when this is resolved one way or another

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:39 p.m.

Did you have to do ts on the most random Friday ever @orange

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:39 p.m.

Dude Im gonna move away from mayflower istg

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:51 p.m.

@Kezzera

Hello. The warrant was enjoined just now, and martial law has been enjoined by the CJ.

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:51 p.m.

cc: @mantisshrimp69

@meowiitten

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:52 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/america-flag-gif-24744862

meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:54 p.m.

@Brenda

Join game so we can arrest you

meowiitten

@Brenda Join game so we can arrest you

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:54 p.m.

Hi, that was enjoined

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:55 p.m.

You have been indefinitely sentenced to prison by order of AlexJCabot, Lord Chancellor

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:55 p.m.

Please take up any grievances with the Supreme Court's appellate clerk.

Brenda

Hi, that was enjoined

meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:55 p.m.

Join the game and see how that bodes for you

meowiitten

Join the game and see how that bodes for you

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:55 p.m.

Will you arrest me from behind bars?

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:55 p.m.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1332426240140906577/1407596141675151421/togif.gif

Brenda

Will you arrest me from behind bars?

meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:56 p.m.

I'm standing in a crowd right now I'm not even in jai

meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:56 p.m.

:Sob

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:56 p.m.

It will be entered soon. God bless

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:56 p.m.

cc: @cabot Please have this entered

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:57 p.m.

@Kezzera

We ask that Sadoimpacto be removed from these proceedings. See below.

Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ used

/remove

clerkFlow Bot2025-09-19 05:58 p.m.

Case Modified

@cabot

has removed @meowiitten from the case channel.

Brenda 2025-09-19 05:59 p.m.

Thank you.

Kezzera 2025-09-19 06:02 p.m.

Well i'll need someone here eventually(edited)

Kezzera 2025-09-19 06:02 p.m.

* Sent from my Galaxy A1

Kezzera 2025-09-19 08:34 p.m.

Hi we're back

Kezzera

Hi we're back

Brenda 2025-09-19 08:42 p.m.

Hello

Brenda 2025-09-19 09:17 p.m.

@Kezzera

@mantisshrimp69

Given my appointment to the bench, I am moving to withdraw as counsel

Brenda 2025-09-19 09:18 p.m.

Npz_v, I believe you can represent yourself for the remainder of this case?

Kezzera 2025-09-19 09:50 p.m.

@mantisshrimp69

?

Brenda

@Kezzera

@mantisshrimp69 Given my appointment to the bench, I am moving to withdraw as counsel

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 11:20 p.m.

Oh damn

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 11:23 p.m.

@Kezzera

yes of course I’ll go pro se

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 11:23 p.m.

Could you quickly tell me where we are at with this case

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 11:23 p.m.

Since I am just returning to it

Kezzera 2025-09-20 01:58 a.m.

We're considering your TRO, state made submissions

Brenda

@Kezzera

@mantisshrimp69 Given my appointment to the bench, I am moving to withdraw as counsel

Kezzera 2025-09-20 01:58 a.m.

I thought I entered order

Kezzera 2025-09-20 01:59 a.m.

ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that BrendaPopplewell, Esq. of Bennett, Ellis & Matlock LLC is withdrawn from this case. Accordingly, their representation for Plaintiff is terminated.

Signed
Albert Wellesley
Chief Judge
September 20, 2002(edited)

Kezzera

We're considering your TRO, state made submissions

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-20 10:20 a.m.

Okay

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-20 10:20 a.m.

Can I have the TRO

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-20 12:34 p.m.

@Kezzera

Kezzera 2025-09-20 07:11 p.m.

@mantisshrimp69

@meowiitten

ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order be GRANTED. See attached for the [Order](https://drive.google.com/file/d/19DQLT_RznVwLzCjIblY0k6QJ_ORWZBax/view?usp=sharing).(edited)

CV-450-25_OrderMisc_TRO_granted.pdf

Kezzera

@mantisshrimp69

@meowiitten ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order be GRANTED. See attached for the [Order](https://drive.g...(edited)

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 11:05 a.m.

Thank you, your honor

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 11:05 a.m.

Now we ask the solicitor general be summoned and ordered to produce a responsive pleading within 7 days, pursuant to the rules

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 11:05 a.m.

I can provide a draft summons unless the bot is used

Kezzera 2025-09-21 04:37 p.m.

state has appeared.. the fuck are you talking about?

Kezzera

state has appeared.. the fuck are you talking about?

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 04:48 p.m.

to my knowledge they havent

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 04:48 p.m.

Theyve spoken in the chat but they havent waived summons or presented a notice of appearance

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 04:49 p.m.

Unless you'd like to correct me

Kezzera 2025-09-21 04:53 p.m.

oh i swear they did hold on

Kezzera

oh i swear they did hold on

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 04:53 p.m.

if they did I retract

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 04:54 p.m.

their deadline will be earlier which is good for me

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 04:54 p.m.

But to my knowledge they didnt

Kezzera 2025-09-21 05:44 p.m.

They appeared yesz

Kezzera

They appeared yesz

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 05:56 p.m.

Okay

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 05:57 p.m.

Do you know when?

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 05:57 p.m.

They’d have 7 days from the date of waiving summons and appearing

BotclerkFlow

Click to see command.

Kezzera 2025-09-21 06:22 p.m.

.

Kezzera

.

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 06:23 p.m.

That doesn’t count

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 06:23 p.m.

There wasn’t even a complaint

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 06:23 p.m.

They need to be summoned (or waive summons) after a duly submitted complaint

Kezzera 2025-09-21 06:26 p.m.

You realize I'll have to reset this case back right

Kezzera 2025-09-21 06:26 p.m.

that means your TRO is just gone too

Kezzera 2025-09-21 06:27 p.m.

When he's just appeared here, willingly

Kezzera 2025-09-21 06:27 p.m.

Are we really going to have an issue over this?

Kezzera 2025-09-21 06:27 p.m.

It's your choice, I don't mind either way

Kezzera

You realize I'll have to reset this case back right

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 06:54 p.m.

no...you won't

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 06:54 p.m.

he appeared but not officially and he hasn't waived summons

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 06:54 p.m.

that's all acceptable, because we were at the TRO stage

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 06:54 p.m.

now that the TRO is granted, he can be summoned and given 7 days to produce a responsive pleading

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 06:54 p.m.

the reason I'm holding you to this is that this is procedurally required

Kezzera 2025-09-21 07:03 p.m.

He's been summoned, he appeared here

Kezzera 2025-09-21 07:03 p.m.

TRO runs parallel to this - his deadline began from the date he quite literally appeared in response to this lawsuit(edited)

Kezzera 2025-09-21 07:04 p.m.

I'm happy to be shown otherwise?

Kezzera

He's been summoned, he appeared here

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:05 p.m.

he was not summoned

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:05 p.m.

summons requires a summons

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:05 p.m.

at the very least the command

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:05 p.m.

adding somebody to a channel allows them to speak but it is not a summons

Kezzera

TRO runs parallel to this - his deadline began from the date he quite literally appeared in response to this lawsuit(edited)

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:06 p.m.

No, a deadline runs 7 days (in the case fo the government) from the date of issuance of a summons

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:06 p.m.

there was no summons

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:06 p.m.

and that's OKAY

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:07 p.m.

he shouldn't have been summoned before the TRO was disposed of because it's an emergency and requires ex parte review (unless the other party appears voluntarily to fight the TRO, but they still need to be summonsed unless they waive it)

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:07 p.m.

all you need to do is /summon the SG

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:07 p.m.

then we wait 7 days that's it

Kezzera 2025-09-21 09:27 p.m.

State literally appeared

mantisshrimp69

No, a deadline runs 7 days (in the case fo the government) from the date of issuance of a summons

Kezzera 2025-09-21 09:28 p.m.

Right, that's on you then

Kezzera used

/summon

clerkFlow Bot2025-09-21 09:28 p.m.

:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @k

(edited)

Kezzera pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 02:58 p.m.

Kezzera

State literally appeared

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 09:30 p.m.

Didn’t waive summons

Kezzera 2025-09-23 04:03 a.m.

Well it's on you

BotclerkFlow

:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @k

Kezzera 2025-09-23 04:04 a.m.

The clock starts from here, according to you

mantisshrimp69

he shouldn't have been summoned before the TRO was disposed of because it's an emergency and requires ex parte review (unless the other party appears voluntarily to fight the TRO, ...

Kezzera 2025-09-23 04:05 a.m.

To correct you on this - no, this was not ex parte

Kezzera 2025-09-23 04:05 a.m.

State appeared quite literally as soon as they got wind of this

Kezzera 2025-09-23 04:06 a.m.

and made representations

Kezzera

To correct you on this - no, this was not ex parte

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 08:24 a.m.

Because they appeared voluntarily to fight the TRO, but they still needed to be summonsed unless they waive it

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 08:24 a.m.

That is literally what I said

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 08:24 a.m.

It’s in the message being replied to

Kezzera 2025-09-23 01:56 p.m.

I do not get you sometimes

Kezzera 2025-09-23 02:00 p.m.

Your ability to being confidently wrong about personal jurisdiction and parallel processes astonishes me

2

Kezzera 2025-09-23 02:02 p.m.

@k

you need to use the /appear command to file NOAs now

Kezzera 2025-09-23 02:08 p.m.

(figure it out yourself, I shouldn't have to explain this to you npz)

judicialFLOW Bot2025-09-23 04:01 p.m.

(edited)

Appearance Request

Requester: @k
Party: Government
Channel: npz_v-v-senate-of-the-state-of-mayflower

A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.

Status

Request expired.

Approve

Deny

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 04:25 p.m.

@Kezzera

Kezzera

Your ability to being confidently wrong about personal jurisdiction and parallel processes astonishes me

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 04:27 p.m.

I’m not wrong about this, and I’d appreciate it if instead of insulting me purely for the memeworthiness you accepted it with grace when I point out flaws in the process

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 04:29 p.m.

In this case, I am a litigant, and you are the presiding judge. I’m being respectful and pointing out flaws I know are there—in response, you flagrantly insult me and refuse to acknowledge what I say to you only because I’m constructively criticizing you

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 04:30 p.m.

I should not have to weigh whether I want a future dismissal for insufficient service of process or facing the possibility of being undermined by random people in chatroom

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 04:31 p.m.

I reiterate I’ve been nothing but respectful since the beginning of this case and I expect the same from you. You are allowed to disagree with what I say, but even if I’m wrong, you should not speak to me that way

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 04:32 p.m.

Given the insightful conversations I’ve had with you in the past it is unpleasant to see you act in such a way and I hope you can see that

judicialFLOW Bot2025-09-23 07:23 p.m.

@k

appears for Government (approved by @Kezzera).

judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 02:58 p.m.

Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:23 p.m.

@k

APPEARANCE ENTERED

mantisshrimp69

Given the insightful conversations I’ve had with you in the past it is unpleasant to see you act in such a way and I hope you can see that

Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:24 p.m.

I politely disagree

Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:24 p.m.

I expect you to understand, yourself, the error

Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:25 p.m.

You should understand it

Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:25 p.m.

You are a member of this Court, and it is a standard for members of this Court to understand this process

Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:26 p.m.

If you want to know where you are wrong, I invite you to message me directly about it

Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:26 p.m.

I will not flood the record with it here

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 07:26 p.m.

I don’t believe I’ve made an error and I’ve justified my rationale, but whether or not I was correct is beyond the object of what I said

Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:26 p.m.

I will not continue this conversation longer

Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:27 p.m.

You can take it directly to me instead

User

Message could not be loaded.

Deverus 2025-09-26 08:58 p.m.

Deverus 2025-09-26 08:58 p.m.

cc: @mantisshrimp69

Deverus

Click to see attachment.

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-26 09:39 p.m.

Thanks

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 11:35 p.m.

@Xerxy

@Deverus

@Kezzera

I move for entry of default by the clerk (or, alternatively, by the court)

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 11:35 p.m.

Further motion as to damages and whatnot will be filed within 24hrs

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 11:35 p.m.

Damages, affidavit all of that

Deverus 2025-09-29 08:10 a.m.

ORDER:

The Clerk for the Hon. AlbertWellesley, in accordance with the provisions under Mayfl. R. Civ. Pro. 37(a), enters default in the matter of npz_v vs. Mayfl. State Senate (CV-450-25). Judgement on damages reserved for the presiding judge, pending plaintiff's motion for default judgement to satisfy the requirements provided under Mayfl. R. Civ. Pro. 37(f).

Signed,
DeverusLazvari
Clerk
September 29 2002
cc: @mantisshrimp69

@k

(edited)

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-29 12:52 p.m.

Thanks

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-29 08:29 p.m.

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT

https://drive.google.com/file/d/16Tp8gc9MrXqCHSbyBW2SJML0SAXavbU2/view?usp=sharing

Cc @Kezzera

@Doogy

mantisshrimp69

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT

https://drive.google.com/file/d/16Tp8gc9MrXqCHSbyBW2SJML0SAXavbU2/view?usp=sh...

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-29 08:35 p.m.

Can we imagine it also asks for attorney’s fees (because Brenda charged me 125k case-wide before having to recuse)

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-29 08:35 p.m.

I forgot to put it in

Kezzera 2025-09-30 07:43 a.m.

Provide full context for that and I'll consider it. Follow this format

**Plaintiff's Motion for Awarding of Attorney Fees**

Plaintiff requests this Court to consider and assess the awarding of Attorney Fees against Defendant, for the following reasons:
1. ...

npz_v
PLAINTIFF PRO SE

Kezzera

Provide full context for that and I'll consider it. Follow this format ``` Plaintiff's Motion for Awarding of Attorney Fees Plaintiff requests this Court to consider and asse...

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-30 01:14 p.m.

Plaintiff's Motion for Awarding of Attorney Fees

Plaintiff requests this Court to consider and assess the awarding of Attorney Fees against Defendant, for the following reasons:
1. My former attorney, BrendaPopplewell, charged me UC$125,000 to try this case.

npz_v
PLAINTIFF PRO SE(edited)

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-30 05:42 p.m.

@Kezzera

can I have relief

mantisshrimp69 2025-09-30 05:42 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/happy-tears-gif-10671147036440426996

mantisshrimp69

Plaintiff's Motion for Awarding of Attorney Fees Plaintiff requests this Court to consider and assess the awarding of Attorney Fees against Defendant, for the following reason...(edited)

Kezzera 2025-10-02 01:46 a.m.

You won't bother justifying this?

mantisshrimp69

https://tenor.com/view/happy-tears-gif-10671147036440426996

Kezzera 2025-10-02 01:47 a.m.

Looking at your default pkg later

Kezzera

You won't bother justifying this?

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 09:25 a.m.

I just did, I don’t know what you want me to say

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 10:47 a.m.

I had lawyer for this case

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 10:47 a.m.

She charged me $125k

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 10:47 a.m.

Had to recuse and I continued

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 10:48 a.m.

In total I spent $125k in atty’s fees

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 10:48 a.m.

So logically those are awarded

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-03 10:05 a.m.

@Kezzera

your honor

Kezzera 2025-10-03 11:56 p.m.

Hearing is scheduled for today on the show cause order(edited)

Kezzera

Hearing is scheduled for today on the show cause order(edited)

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 05:12 a.m.

??

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 05:12 a.m.

What show cause order

Kezzera 2025-10-04 06:58 a.m.

for the PI

Kezzera 2025-10-04 06:58 a.m.

you didn't know?

Kezzera 2025-10-04 06:59 a.m.

i mean state did appear initially for the tro, don't know where they're at right now

Kezzera

for the PI

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:06 a.m.

Oh

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:06 a.m.

That order to show cause

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:06 a.m.

Yes

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:06 a.m.

But like sir

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:06 a.m.

They’re in default

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:06 a.m.

Lmao

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:06 a.m.

They havent appeared at all

Kezzera

i mean state did appear initially for the tro, don't know where they're at right now

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:06 a.m.

They didn’t appear

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:07 a.m.

They were added to the channel informally and argued against it

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:07 a.m.

But they never appeared

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:07 a.m.

The court already entered default

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:07 a.m.

So can you rule on relief? It’s been a week(edited)

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:50 a.m.

well, they have today..

judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-04 07:50 a.m.

(edited)

Appearance Request

Requester: @actxrz
Party: defendant
Channel: npz_v-v-senate-of-the-state-of-mayflower

A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.

Status

Request expired.

Approve

Deny

judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-04 07:50 a.m.

@actxrz

appears for defendant (approved by @Kezzera).

judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 02:58 p.m.

actxrz 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.

hi

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.

Hello

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.

i assume you are quite busy chasing up these cases

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.

AG kind of left this one in the dust, default has been entered

actxrz 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.

could i get a quick summary on what’s due and any hearings

actxrz 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.

oh

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.

awkwardly we have a PI show cause hearing today

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.

when default is entered

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.

plaintiff has submitted package also requesting the TRO convert to a PI

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.

but i'll likely need some evidence and so forth usually

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.

I already have materials from him

actxrz 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.

today is the hearing?

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.

i need to know why you guys have failed to follow up with this

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.

yes, today

actxrz 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.

ehh idk if i’m available

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.

it's the last day before you guys fail to appear for that

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.

nothing in-game, discord only

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.

my computer isnt here yet

actxrz 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.

i have work from 10-8

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:53 a.m.

well, i don't know then

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:53 a.m.

you guys have defaulted already

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:53 a.m.

this is over an arrest warrant issued by the senate

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:53 a.m.

you're free to discuss with plaintiff about it outside here if you wish?

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:54 a.m.

either you mutually agree to an extended time, but i warn that the order will likely be extended if plaintiff applies

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:54 a.m.

i will consider the rest of his requests

actxrz 2025-10-04 07:54 a.m.

alright could we possibly reschedule the hearing? if not you guys will probably waiting till like 10 or 11 pm for a response

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:54 a.m.

are you aware of what this case is concerning

actxrz 2025-10-04 07:54 a.m.

@mantisshrimp69

Kezzera

are you aware of what this case is concerning

actxrz 2025-10-04 07:54 a.m.

not really

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:54 a.m.

it's about anakin issuing a warrant of arrest against npz

actxrz 2025-10-04 07:55 a.m.

for

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:55 a.m.

senate authority was relied upon this

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:55 a.m.

uh, failure to appear at a senate hearing from what i remember

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:55 a.m.

i've temporarily stopped it from taking effect

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:55 a.m.

for about two weeks

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:55 a.m.

we're on the final day of those two weeks

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:56 a.m.

AG has sent in no response to the complaint, you'll see my back and forth about the process above

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:56 a.m.

and plaintiff filed a default

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:56 a.m.

clerk has entered it

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:56 a.m.

so now we're here

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:57 a.m.

AG, then SG, got the summons papers

actxrz 2025-10-04 07:57 a.m.

previous ones?

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:57 a.m.

xolaaz yes

actxrz 2025-10-04 07:57 a.m.

mkay

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:57 a.m.

he's in this chat too

actxrz 2025-10-04 07:57 a.m.

oh

actxrz 2025-10-04 07:57 a.m.

before or after default was entered

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:58 a.m.

before default

actxrz 2025-10-04 07:58 a.m.

err

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:58 a.m.

so i expected something but

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:58 a.m.

i got nothing

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:58 a.m.

no new appearance requests anywhere

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:58 a.m.

that's where we are at with this

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:58 a.m.

i understand the situation is a bit awkward procedurally, i hadn't noticed it

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:59 a.m.

but it's workable

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:59 a.m.

either both of you agree to a time in the next hour or so, or i will tell you all when to submit arguments, if any

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:59 a.m.

it'll be over discord so you'll get a day to respond

Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:59 a.m.

the chat has all the papers available

Kezzera

it's the last day before you guys fail to appear for that

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:32 a.m.

Excuse me

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:33 a.m.

You don’t enter default against the defendant for a week and the moment they appear weeks later you restart the case

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:33 a.m.

He cannot appear anymore

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:33 a.m.

He’s in default

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:33 a.m.

This is not fair for me

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:34 a.m.

Plus you’re essentially telling the state what to do

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:38 a.m.

There is NO OSC because they’re in default

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:38 a.m.

You extend the TRO and make it permanent

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:40 a.m.

Do you want me to put all this in a motion for what I think you should do?

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:40 a.m.

@Kezzera

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:35 p.m.

No?

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:36 p.m.

You can cost your entire case with this sass though

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:36 p.m.

Sass

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:36 p.m.

?

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:36 p.m.

What sass

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:36 p.m.

The state defaulted, they didn’t appear for two weeks, and you refused to grant me relief at every turn, but now that the state appears ages late you suddenly work at the speed of light

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.

They’re already in default

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.

Did both of you have any discussion about this case

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.

Hey

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.

No

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.

Listen

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.

I didn't deny relief

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.

I've noticed the TRO

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.

There's a show cause

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.

I need to know what's up with them

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.

When there’s a TRO and the defendant defaults, the TRO is converted into a permanent injunction

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.

The OSC is terminated

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.

That’s common sense

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.

If they don't bother today then it's full relief

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.

That’s not how it works though

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.

Am I supposed to automatically grant you permanent injunctions?

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.

Show me

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.

If the defendant doesn’t appear….

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.

Yes…

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.

Show me

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.

That’s what default is…

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.

Show you what

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.

Show me

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.

Where's the authority

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:39 p.m.

That says I must

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:40 p.m.

You’re asking me to show you why the defendant doesn’t get a chance to respond when he defaults

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:40 p.m.

The only authority I need is the definition of default judgment

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:40 p.m.

I'm asking you for authority which requires me to grant you permanent injunction automatically on default judgment

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:42 p.m.

Ok Im with friends rn I’ll file motion today

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:42 p.m.

Is that ok

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:43 p.m.

Until then I’d appreciate it if we stayed the post-default OSC or anything else of that sort

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:46 p.m.

You understand that you will likely face that warrant if I rescheduled the show cause hearing

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:46 p.m.

@mantisshrimp69

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:47 p.m.

The TRO expires after today(edited)

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:47 p.m.

If I allowed you both to instead make submissions within one day starting now that can be avoided

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:50 p.m.

e360 v Spamhaus, 500 F.3d 594, 604 (7th Cir. 2007) for my authority supporting the view that an automatic grant is not required(edited)

Kezzera

You understand that you will likely face that warrant if I rescheduled the show cause hearing

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:51 p.m.

Keep the TRO until then

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:51 p.m.

I'll just open session now

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:57 p.m.

@mantisshrimp69

@actxrz

We're now in open session - show cause hearing begins for a PI begins from here.

Instructions

1. Each party will submit their complete arguments here. Plaintiff will get 24 hours from now, and then Defendant will get 24 hours after Plaintiff makes their arguments.
2. Arguments must be at most 1-3 messages, in block text which contains the entire argument. No further allowance except with leave of court.

* The TRO is extended for an additional 48 hours.
* There is an entry of default for this case. You need to be aware of the consequences of that default if you are affected by it.

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:57 p.m.

Remote means, no in-game

Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:58 p.m.

No motions will be accepted at this point. That opportunity has now passed. Motions that can be accepted must be in relation to the default package submitted earlier.

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 04:13 p.m.

An OSC is simply not proper

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 04:13 p.m.

What will the PI extend throughout if the proceedings are already over because default was entered?

Kezzera 2025-10-04 11:52 p.m.

So

Kezzera 2025-10-04 11:53 p.m.

The PI, if granted, would then allow me to grant injunctive relief you requested on default

Kezzera 2025-10-04 11:53 p.m.

That's the purpose of it now(edited)

Kezzera

So

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 07:03 a.m.

Ok here’s my justification

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 07:04 a.m.

The senate, as the court already decided, had no authority to issue a warrant for my arrest in this setting. If I’m arrested, I risk a violation of my rights.

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 07:04 a.m.

There

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 08:05 a.m.

It still baffles me that this OSC is still active

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 08:05 a.m.

Because default means that the defendant didn’t appear and all relief is granted automatically

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 08:06 a.m.

So why does he get another chance to appear just to rebut some part of the relief

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 08:06 a.m.

It’s dumb and it’s not how it’s done

Kezzera 2025-10-05 11:21 a.m.

You may raise this on appeal if you really wish

Kezzera 2025-10-05 11:21 a.m.

But I'm covering every single literal ground when I do this

mantisshrimp69

The senate, as the court already decided, had no authority to issue a warrant for my arrest in this setting. If I’m arrested, I risk a violation of my rights.

Kezzera 2025-10-05 11:23 a.m.

4 months ago

or Monday, October 6, 2025 at 7:03 a.m.

@actxrz

< response due by this time

mantisshrimp69

The senate, as the court already decided, had no authority to issue a warrant for my arrest in this setting. If I’m arrested, I risk a violation of my rights.

actxrz 2025-10-05 11:23 a.m.

js to this right

Kezzera 2025-10-05 11:23 a.m.

aye

actxrz 2025-10-05 11:23 a.m.

im not responding to the other stuff

Kezzera 2025-10-05 11:23 a.m.

No, just to the thing I replied to

User

Message could not be loaded.

actxrz 2025-10-05 11:23 a.m.

actxrz 2025-10-05 11:23 a.m.

@mantisshrimp69

Kezzera 2025-10-05 11:24 a.m.

You sent me my own SO

Kezzera 2025-10-05 11:24 a.m.

oh

Kezzera

No, just to the thing I replied to

actxrz 2025-10-05 11:24 a.m.

understood, thank you

Kezzera 2025-10-05 11:25 a.m.

Of course

actxrz 2025-10-05 07:36 p.m.

@Kezzera

ok we are settling

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:13 a.m.

okay, need terms outlined here unless confidential?

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:13 a.m.

@actxrz

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:13 a.m.

if confidential, why it must be

actxrz 2025-10-06 05:48 a.m.

no ifs not

actxrz 2025-10-06 05:48 a.m.

it’s*

Kezzera

okay, need terms outlined here unless confidential?

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 06:07 a.m.

Ill send

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 06:08 a.m.

Cus court has jurisdiction to enforce

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 06:08 a.m.

But you shouldn’t require that for settlements

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 06:08 a.m.

Parties aren’t required to have the court approve it

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 06:08 a.m.

That’s for consent judgments which are needed only in special cases

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 06:22 a.m.

Please check your DMs @Kezzera

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:30 p.m.

I don't know why you jump straight to the conclusion im wanting the terms so I can approve it(edited)

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:30 p.m.

If I need to approve it I will explicitly tell you that(edited)

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:31 p.m.

I don't know why you tell me how to do my job

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:32 p.m.

I know when I need to approve it, if I have discretion to impose such a requirement or just never require court approval for a particular settlement

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:33 p.m.

It's pissing me off, stop

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:33 p.m.

You don't have to remind me when and how to deal with certain legal matters

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:34 p.m.

Litigants usually note these for appeal or some corrective process, not correct them on the spot. You look like a smartass doing that. No one likes it

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:34 p.m.

This is the fucking problem honestly

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:35 p.m.

Let me get shit wrong, let me fix it, and if I never fix it then you'll get your chance to

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:38 p.m.

if you are making a mistake in logic or law before ruling it's my diligent duty (or would be if I wasn't pro se) to tell you

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:38 p.m.

lawyers are there to make legal arguments

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:38 p.m.

YOU NOTE IT DOWN.

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:38 p.m.

YOU RESPECTFULLY SUGGEST CORRECTION WHEN ITS INVITED.

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:38 p.m.

THAT IS THE FIRST THING YOU SHOULD HAVE FUCKING LEARNED.

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:39 p.m.

IM TIRED OF YOU DOING THIS SHIT FOUR HUNDRED FUCKING TIMES.

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:39 p.m.

STOP.

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:40 p.m.

I have been extremely patient with you despite your complete confidence in being wrong on certain occasions, where you insist on not even hearing me out on how you are or might be wrong

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:40 p.m.

And then just insist you're right

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:40 p.m.

You treat me like I'm a fucking retard

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:40 p.m.

It's fucking demeaning

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:40 p.m.

Cut it

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:41 p.m.

I respectfully disagree, I think I've been respectful of the court and all parties

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:41 p.m.

I understand not wanting correction when a decision is alreaady made

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:41 p.m.

You're not listening

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:41 p.m.

But when it isn't it is fundamentally a lawyer's job to make arguments

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:42 p.m.

A lawyers job is to advocate for the best legal interests of their client

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:42 p.m.

Not to hurl everything at the court

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:42 p.m.

There's humility to the art of advocacy

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:42 p.m.

and there's human too

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:42 p.m.

Know when to read the room

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:43 p.m.

A simple acknowledgement would suffice and a copy of the terms

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:43 p.m.

so I can put it on the record, or not

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:43 p.m.

your choice

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:43 p.m.

and state as well

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:44 p.m.

And a voluntary dismissal notice

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:44 p.m.

Since this is being settled

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:44 p.m.

you said I had to send it unless it was confidential

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:44 p.m.

and to justify why it was confidential if it was

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:44 p.m.

I asked state

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:44 p.m.

They said it wasn't

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:44 p.m.

Are you willing to give me the terms or no

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:47 p.m.

Yes, because it stipulates continued court jurisdiction over its enforcement

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:47 p.m.

so I kind of have to

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:47 p.m.

Yes!!

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:47 p.m.

So please give me a copy so it would be easier for everyone!!

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:47 p.m.

yes I will once it's signed

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:47 p.m.

# PLEASE.

Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:47 p.m.

Thank you

Kezzera 2025-10-11 01:17 a.m.

I'd like some movement in this case please

Kezzera 2025-10-11 01:24 a.m.

@actxrz

@mantisshrimp69

Kezzera 2025-10-11 01:25 a.m.

What's going on? Has a settlement/stipulation/etc (whatever you want to call it) been signed yet? Where's the voluntary dismissal?

Kezzera

What's going on? Has a settlement/stipulation/etc (whatever you want to call it) been signed yet? Where's the voluntary dismissal?

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-11 07:51 a.m.

Working on it

Kezzera 2025-10-11 12:51 p.m.

Okay

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 08:38 p.m.

@Kezzera

we have touchdown

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 08:39 p.m.

And a signed agreement

mantisshrimp69 Server2025-10-12 08:39 p.m.

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 08:39 p.m.

The paper is technically not signed yet bc I have to go into word and edit it in

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 08:39 p.m.

But I will do that soon

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 08:39 p.m.

It’s signed tho

mantisshrimp69

It’s signed tho

Kezzera 2025-10-13 12:28 p.m.

@actxrz

Has it been signed

actxrz 2025-10-13 12:28 p.m.

yes

actxrz 2025-10-13 12:28 p.m.

its been signed

Kezzera 2025-10-13 12:28 p.m.

Ok

Kezzera 2025-10-13 12:28 p.m.

Give me the signed copy when ready so I can enter it later but you can now go ahead and submit me your voluntary dismissal notice @mantisshrimp69

Kezzera 2025-10-13 12:30 p.m.

Will the warrant cease to have full effect permanently then

Kezzera 2025-10-13 12:30 p.m.

(I'm aware it's alive at the moment)

Kezzera

Give me the signed copy when ready so I can enter it later but you can now go ahead and submit me your voluntary dismissal notice @mantisshrimp69

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-13 12:53 p.m.

I hereby stipulate for voluntary dismissal of this case with prejudice, pursuant to my settlement agreement with Defendants.
-# npz_v

Kezzera 2025-10-13 04:49 p.m.

NOTICE: Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Stipulation between Parties is noted. Action is to be terminated October 14 2002. Dismissed with prejudice. No costs. Clerk is directed to take notice and await further directions from this Court to close this case channel.(edited)

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-13 05:00 p.m.

@Kezzera

you’re not archiving right

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-13 05:00 p.m.

Cus the agreement says u can enforce

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-13 05:00 p.m.

The contract

Kezzera 2025-10-14 05:14 a.m.

i know

Kezzera 2025-10-14 05:14 a.m.

give me the fully signed agreement so i can enter it

Kezzera 2025-10-14 05:14 a.m.

you open a new case when you need to enforce it

Kezzera 2025-10-14 05:15 a.m.

we'll have the details here ready to refer back to

Kezzera

you open a new case when you need to enforce it

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-14 06:10 a.m.

That doesn’t seem efficient

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-14 06:10 a.m.

Cant we just keep this open

Kezzera 2025-10-14 10:31 a.m.

No

Kezzera 2025-10-14 10:32 a.m.

Why would I care if you think it's inefficient

Kezzera 2025-10-14 10:32 a.m.

I will not keep open a case chat if nothing is likely going to happen

Kezzera 2025-10-14 10:32 a.m.

after this case

Kezzera 2025-10-14 10:33 a.m.

As far as I know, it's over, and if any issues arise you can file a new case - we're going to find the records of this case if it is necessary(edited)

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-14 12:59 p.m.

Okay

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 05:42 p.m.

1

mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 05:42 p.m.

@Kezzera

judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-21 06:24 p.m.

@Kezzera

please upload attachments for npz_v v. Senate of the State of Mayflower now. You can send multiple messages. Type done when finished.

Allowed types:

application/pdf, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text/plain

Kezzera 2025-10-21 06:24 p.m.

judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-21 06:24 p.m.

@Kezzera

accepted 1 file(s). (Total: 1/5)

judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-21 06:24 p.m.

@Kezzera

You can upload 4 more — or type done.

Kezzera 2025-10-21 06:25 p.m.

done

User

Message could not be loaded.

judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-21 06:25 p.m.

Uploaded 1/1 file(s).

Kezzera 2025-10-21 07:09 p.m.

Clerk directed to close case

Deverus used

/transcript

clerkFlow Bot2025-10-23 05:54 a.m.

Creating transcript..

clerkFlow Bot2025-10-23 05:54 a.m.

https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1329678726383927409/1430856848289955891 Successfully created transcript.

judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-25 06:59 p.m.

@Deverus

please upload attachments for npz_v v. Senate of the State of Mayflower now. You can send multiple messages. Type done when finished.

Allowed types:

application/pdf, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text/plain

Deverus 2025-10-25 06:59 p.m.

judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-25 06:59 p.m.

@Deverus

rejected (unsupported type): npz_v-vs-mayfl-state-senate-transcript.html

judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-25 06:59 p.m.

@Deverus

You can upload 5 more — or type done.

Deverus 2025-10-25 06:59 p.m.

done

Deverus 2025-10-25 06:59 p.m.

oh. ok then.

Deverus 2025-10-25 06:59 p.m.

done

Deverus 2025-10-25 06:59 p.m.

no transcripts on the trello then ig

clerkFlow Bot2025-10-25 07:01 p.m.

Channel Permissions Synced

Permissions have been synced to Volume XIII.

Exported 620 messages