guild icon
Mayflower District Court
#npz_v-v-senate-of-the-state-of-mayflower
This is the start of #npz_v-v-senate-of-the-state-of-mayflower channel.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-16 03:01 p.m.
New Case
Case Type
habeas
Case Number
CV-450-25
clerkFlow pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 02:58 p.m.
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-16 03:01 p.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Chancellor Cabot.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 03:02 p.m.
@cabot

Docket no. CV-450-25 assigned to Lord Chancellor AlexJCabot
BrendaBrenda used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-16 03:02 p.m.
Case Modified
@Brenda has added @cabot to the case channel.
BrendaBrenda used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-16 03:02 p.m.
Case Modified
@Brenda has added @mantisshrimp69 to the case channel.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:02 p.m.
Thanks
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-16 03:02 p.m.
Case Modified
@cabot has added @meowiitten to the case channel.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:02 p.m.
hiiiii
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:02 p.m.
>.<
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:02 p.m.
@meowiitten Want to say anything
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
@meowiitten Want to say anything
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.
Yeah just reassign
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.
Since he didn't file a complaint yet
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.
can it be oral @cabot
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.
do I even need something written
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.
Reassign to anyone but you as you already commented on the case(edited)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.
I wasnt subpoenaed. That's like all there is to it
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.
I already commented on this so it cant be me
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.
@cabot you were commenting on it as a judge
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.
@Kezzera
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.
Want this
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.
when I sent it to you
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.
it was because you were a judge
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.
to adjudicate on it
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.
not to get an opinion
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.
...
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:03 p.m.
I asked you to make a channel
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:04 p.m.
Listen buddy I am radical but I'm not that radical
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 03:04 p.m.
Buddy don't try to throw him under the bus
😭2
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:04 p.m.
You can still recuse if you want
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:04 p.m.
okay sure
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:04 p.m.
another judge is gonna take ages though
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:04 p.m.
You a spastic too, you saw me speaking abotu this but gave me it anyway sybau @Brenda
😭1
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 03:04 p.m.
h
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ 2025-09-16 03:04 p.m.
@Richostein @Doogy @Kezzera Any of you want it
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 03:05 p.m.
Yeah give it to richo this case will not see the light of day
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-16 03:05 p.m.
This case file will grow mold
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-16 03:05 p.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Chambers of Chief Judge Kezzera.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 03:05 p.m.
Reassigned to @Kezzera
meowiittenmeowiitten
This case file will grow mold
Richostein
Richostein 2025-09-16 03:05 p.m.
WTF.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 03:05 p.m.
mb
BrendaBrenda used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-16 03:06 p.m.
Case Modified
@Brenda has added @mantisshrimp69 to the case channel.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:06 p.m.
@Richostein Hi
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:06 p.m.
@Kezzera Hi
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:53 p.m.
aigu
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:53 p.m.
right
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:53 p.m.
let me make it clear
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:53 p.m.
shit needs to be filed
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:53 p.m.
if you don't file it we won't consider it
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:53 p.m.
it's pretty obvious
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:54 p.m.
in fact, we cannot even begin to review or consider any of your claims if you don't file a complaint
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:54 p.m.
or standalone petition
KezzeraKezzera
in fact, we cannot even begin to review or consider any of your claims if you don't file a complaint
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:55 p.m.
I know
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:55 p.m.
I will
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:56 p.m.
just tell me the jist of what's going on @mantisshrimp69
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:56 p.m.
so i know what to expect
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:56 p.m.
and i'll determine if this needs re-assignment or not as well
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:56 p.m.
It’ll be in the very written petition
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:56 p.m.
Your honor
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:56 p.m.
when can i expect it?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:57 p.m.
Prob today
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:57 p.m.
Tomorrow latest
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:57 p.m.
It’s emergency so
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:57 p.m.
is this a time sensitive matter at all?
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:57 p.m.
right
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 03:57 p.m.
They’re gonna arrest me so
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:57 p.m.
you filed it under the habeas category so i will assume some kind of imprisonment
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 03:57 p.m.
going to or have?
KezzeraKezzera
you filed it under the habeas category so i will assume some kind of imprisonment
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 04:03 p.m.
It’s meant to be a sort of motion to quash
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 04:03 p.m.
@meowiitten you should take notice as to the above matter
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
It’s meant to be a sort of motion to quash
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 04:03 p.m.
i'll anticipate something
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 05:25 p.m.
@Kezzera hello
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 05:25 p.m.
My bad my attorney is not yet here
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 05:25 p.m.
@Brenda is my lawyer
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-16 05:26 p.m.
Please add
KezzeraKezzera used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-16 05:56 p.m.
Case Modified
@Kezzera has added @Brenda to the case channel.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 05:57 p.m.
Ah!
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 05:57 p.m.
Soy holy!
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 05:57 p.m.
@Kezzera Ah!!!!!
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 05:58 p.m.
Your Honor, I will be filing our complaint soon
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 05:58 p.m.
We intend to seek a TRO
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-16 05:58 p.m.
Thanks
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 08:59 p.m.
@Kezzera @mantisshrimp69
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 09:00 p.m.
@Kezzera We move for a Temporary Restraining Order enjoining enforcement of the Arrest Warrant. My client faces a credible threat of arrest in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. Elrod v. Burns, 427 U.S. 347, 373 (1976) ("The loss of [Constitutional] freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.") (emphasis added).(edited)
✅1
BrendaBrenda
@Kezzera @mantisshrimp69
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 09:04 p.m.
Please excuse some of the typos (and omissions in the Parties section), this was written in a hurry due to the urgent nature of this matter.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-16 09:21 p.m.
Pursuant to Mayf. R. Civ. P. 17(a), Plaintiff Npz_v hereby amends his Complaint once as a matter of course.
BrendaBrenda
Pursuant to Mayf. R. Civ. P. 17(a), Plaintiff Npz_v hereby amends his Complaint once as a matter of course.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-17 11:39 a.m.
EXHIBITS
BrendaBrenda
@Kezzera We move for a Temporary Restraining Order enjoining enforcement of the Arrest Warrant. My client faces a credible threat of arrest in violation of his Fourth...(edited)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-17 02:20 p.m.
@Kezzera Bump
BrendaBrenda
Pursuant to Mayf. R. Civ. P. 17(a), Plaintiff Npz_v hereby amends his Complaint once as a matter of course.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-17 02:26 p.m.
this, TRO above and Exhibits A/B?
KezzeraKezzera
this, TRO above and Exhibits A/B?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-17 02:27 p.m.
Yes Your Honor
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-17 02:28 p.m.
Ok
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-17 07:39 p.m.
@Kezzera ETA on ruling on TRO?
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-18 12:31 a.m.
When do you need it by
KezzeraKezzera
When do you need it by
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:22 a.m.
Its emergency
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:22 a.m.
Im gonna be arrested
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:22 a.m.
And molested by a guy I dont know
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-18 06:22 a.m.
The sooner u can enjoin that the better
KezzeraKezzera
When do you need it by
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-18 09:35 a.m.
Right now would be optimal.
BrendaBrenda
@Kezzera We move for a Temporary Restraining Order enjoining enforcement of the Arrest Warrant. My client faces a credible threat of arrest in violation of his Fourth...(edited)
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 02:59 p.m.
@meowiitten considering you've been put on notice about this whole suit and you're here, do you want to be involved at all with this TRO?(edited)
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 02:59 p.m.
if yes, we're scheduling a hearing today
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 02:59 p.m.
otherwise i'll decide
BrendaBrenda used
/add
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-19 03:00 p.m.
Case Modified
@Brenda has added @meowiitten to the case channel.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 03:00 p.m.
he didn't have perms?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 03:00 p.m.
Apparently not
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 03:00 p.m.
oops
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 03:00 p.m.
yeah when he left the server it removed him, thought it automatically re-added
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 03:06 p.m.
@Kezzera Verbal or written response?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 03:06 p.m.
I mean I can just quickly explain why relief should be put off
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 03:07 p.m.
First of all, under the fugitive disentitlement doctrine because he is yet to turn himself in and is using this lawsuit to essentially evade/delay his capture
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 03:08 p.m.
Second, he is unlikely to succeed on the merits because there was, in fact, a subpoena issued that he failed to obey. Legislatures inherently have a power to compel the appearance of absent witnesses (see, e.g., Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 (1935))
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 03:09 p.m.
Third, balance of equities falls against the plaintiff and this court should not enjoin the Senate from exercising its inherent contempt power to compel the attendance of a witnesses who willfully defaulted and failed to appear
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 03:09 p.m.
That's all I have to say
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 03:09 p.m.
@Kezzera
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 03:09 p.m.
@Kezzera I'd like to respond to opposing counsel's point about "fugitive disentitlement"
meowiittenmeowiitten
@Kezzera Verbal or written response?
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:50 p.m.
either
KezzeraKezzera
either
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:50 p.m.
That is my response then I think it's straightforward
✅1
BrendaBrenda
@Kezzera I'd like to respond to opposing counsel's point about "fugitive disentitlement"
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:50 p.m.
You may
meowiittenmeowiitten
Third, balance of equities falls against the plaintiff and this court should not enjoin the Senate from exercising its inherent contempt power to compel the attendance of a witness...
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:51 p.m.
Plaintiff willfully failed to appear?
KezzeraKezzera
Plaintiff willfully failed to appear?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:52 p.m.
I mean yeah. Subpoean with time and date
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:52 p.m.
subpoena*
KezzeraKezzera
You may
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 04:52 p.m.
Your Honor, this action is not barred by fugitive disentitlement for three reasons:
- 28 U.S. Code § 2466, also titled "Fugitive Disentitlement, is a Federal statute, and does not exist in Mayflower law or the common law. Federal laws have no application in the State of Mayflower unless codified by the State Senate. Mayf. Const. art. I, § 11 ("The laws of the Union of Columbia shall not be enforced by the State, unless such laws have been codified by the Legislature.")
- To be a "fugitive" under the doctrine, a person must be evading a criminal case. See, e.g., 28 U.S. Code § 2466 (c) ("otherwise evades the jurisdiction of the court in which a criminal case is pending against the person; and")
- Npz_v has not fled. In fact, in a Discord message, he made it clear to the Sergeant-at-Arms that he will submit to any arrest until the arrest warrant is judicially voided, see below:
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 04:52 p.m.
@Kezzera I believe Sadoimpacto coached DonMDomers to not arrest my client, so that he may argue fugitive disentitlement
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 04:52 p.m.
As such, I move for sanctions and/or contempt.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:52 p.m.
He is evading a warrant for his arrest, fugitive disentitlement is a common law doctrine
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:53 p.m.
As well as statutory
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:53 p.m.
Ok pop off
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:53 p.m.
Regardless I rest on the other prongs
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 04:53 p.m.
Oh, so opposing counsel is conceding?
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 04:53 p.m.
That was a very sheepish "Regardless"
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 04:53 p.m.
I'm not sure what to make of that
meowiittenmeowiitten
He is evading a warrant for his arrest, fugitive disentitlement is a common law doctrine
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 04:53 p.m.
Dude I asked how he wanted to arrest me 3 days ago and he’s ignoring me
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 04:53 p.m.
@Kezzera
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
Dude I asked how he wanted to arrest me 3 days ago and he’s ignoring me
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 04:54 p.m.
This screams of "I was told to not arrest him by Sadoimpacto"
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 04:54 p.m.
Why else would the Sergeant-at-Arms refuse to arrest my client when he offered himself
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
Dude I asked how he wanted to arrest me 3 days ago and he’s ignoring me
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:54 p.m.
Allow counsel to make submissions for you(edited)
meowiittenmeowiitten
I mean yeah. Subpoean with time and date
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:55 p.m.
@Brenda @meowiitten
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:55 p.m.
If I understood the complaint correctly, service got butchered pretty badly
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:56 p.m.
it was sent to the wrong account
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:56 p.m.
Was service re-attempted, or what's going on with that?(edited)
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 04:56 p.m.
Service was not re attempted, Your Honor
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 04:56 p.m.
After AnakinT0ast discovered the mishap, he called the process server a "f* retard"
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 04:57 p.m.
But he nonetheless refused to re-attempt service
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 04:57 p.m.
and has not removed the arrest warrant
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:57 p.m.
Since npz_v has been ban evading (already DM'd discord about this), it was nearly impossible to locate the proper account @Kezzera
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:57 p.m.
I mean emailed discord
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:57 p.m.
Not DM'd them
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 04:57 p.m.
We are not tight like that
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:59 p.m.
How would you know he was even ban evading
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:59 p.m.
How can you even show he was in fact evading at all from service
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 04:59 p.m.
Wouldn't that require a showing that Plaintiff had knowledge that he'd face this kind of enforcement in the first place??
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:00 p.m.
@Kezzera @meowiitten

“[N]o Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, * * *" U.S. Const. amend. XIV
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated unless by probable cause or by a Warrant issued by a Court of Law.” Mayf. Const., art X., § 8.
I would also urge this Court to take into consideration that (1) this "warrant" was not supported by an oath or affirmation by a law enforcement officer; and (2) it was not issued by a "Court of Law" under our Constitution's more rigorous protections.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:00 p.m.
That in an of itself demonstrates likelihood of success on the merits.
KezzeraKezzera
How would you know he was even ban evading
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:02 p.m.
@meowiitten
KezzeraKezzera
How would you know he was even ban evading
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:02 p.m.
Because he's made 3 different accounts(edited)
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:03 p.m.
He was banned the first time for saying something along the lines of "I want my 13 year old to send porn to another 13 year old"
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:03 p.m.
He is on his 3rd or 4th account
meowiittenmeowiitten
He was banned the first time for saying something along the lines of "I want my 13 year old to send porn to another 13 year old"
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:10 p.m.
...
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:10 p.m.
@Kezzera Alright what the fuck. I ask that the Court immediately order Sadoimpacto to show proof for this allgation, or be held in contempt
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.
I can also clarify for the record that this is patently false
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.
Yeah sure
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.
Video with reload please
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.
Can u link the message
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.
Where is that
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.
^^
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.
It was deleted because you were moderated for it
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:11 p.m.
I wasnt tho
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:12 p.m.
Circular argument much?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:12 p.m.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:12 p.m.
This is another quote
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:12 p.m.
I did say that
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:12 p.m.
That’s a legitimate question
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:12 p.m.
I reiterate I was not moderated for anything like that
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:12 p.m.
Where’s the relevance
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:13 p.m.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:13 p.m.
We got you in two different fonts lil bro(edited)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:14 p.m.
I don’t remember ever saying that, there’s no messages about that that you can actually point to
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:15 p.m.
Okay lets just move on
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:15 p.m.
It's clearly not relevant to the merits of this case
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:15 p.m.
@Kezzera @meowiitten
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:24 p.m.
We're moving on
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:24 p.m.
that's just deviating from the issue here
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:24 p.m.
It may be a reasonable guess, but it's speculative
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:24 p.m.
It would be on npz to reveal why he was banned
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:24 p.m.
as he's the only one privy to it
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:25 p.m.
Fine, he made several accounts
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:26 p.m.
Plaintiff alleges the senator who issued it made a mistake by cursing out the server
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:26 p.m.
Is that correct?
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:26 p.m.
@Brenda
KezzeraKezzera
Plaintiff alleges the senator who issued it made a mistake by cursing out the server
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:27 p.m.
Well, we just point that out to show that he was aware that a mistake happened
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:28 p.m.
(otherwise he wouldn't have cursed at him, if that's what u meant)
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:32 p.m.
We have been made aware of a warrant issued against you
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:32 p.m.
@Brenda
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:32 p.m.
I will not permit any of you to personally appear in Court
KezzeraKezzera
We have been made aware of a warrant issued against you
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:35 p.m.
Sorry what
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:35 p.m.
Can you elaborate
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:36 p.m.
sigh
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
Sorry what
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:36 p.m.
Orangebear22 crashed out and issued an AW against everyone
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:37 p.m.
Consequently this court is void of any power to deal with any affair in light of the martial law
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:37 p.m.
Run.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:38 p.m.
BRO
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:38 p.m.
:😭:
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 05:38 p.m.
We return when this is resolved one way or another
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:39 p.m.
Did you have to do ts on the most random Friday ever @orange
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:39 p.m.
Dude Im gonna move away from mayflower istg
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:51 p.m.
@Kezzera Hello. The warrant was enjoined just now, and martial law has been enjoined by the CJ.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:51 p.m.
cc: @mantisshrimp69 @meowiitten
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 05:52 p.m.
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:54 p.m.
@Brenda Join game so we can arrest you
meowiittenmeowiitten
@Brenda Join game so we can arrest you
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:54 p.m.
Hi, that was enjoined
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:55 p.m.
You have been indefinitely sentenced to prison by order of AlexJCabot, Lord Chancellor
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:55 p.m.
Please take up any grievances with the Supreme Court's appellate clerk.
BrendaBrenda
Hi, that was enjoined
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:55 p.m.
Join the game and see how that bodes for you
meowiittenmeowiitten
Join the game and see how that bodes for you
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:55 p.m.
Will you arrest me from behind bars?
BrendaBrenda
Will you arrest me from behind bars?
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:56 p.m.
I'm standing in a crowd right now I'm not even in jai
meowiitten
meowiitten 2025-09-19 05:56 p.m.
:Sob
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:56 p.m.
It will be entered soon. God bless
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:56 p.m.
cc: @cabot Please have this entered
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:57 p.m.
@Kezzera We ask that Sadoimpacto be removed from these proceedings. See below.
Chancellor Cabot ᴘᴄChancellor Cabot ᴘᴄ used
/remove
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-19 05:58 p.m.
Case Modified
@cabot has removed @meowiitten from the case channel.
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 05:59 p.m.
Thank you.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 06:02 p.m.
Well i'll need someone here eventually(edited)
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 06:02 p.m.
* Sent from my Galaxy A1
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 08:34 p.m.
Hi we're back
KezzeraKezzera
Hi we're back
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 08:42 p.m.
Hello
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 09:17 p.m.
@Kezzera @mantisshrimp69 Given my appointment to the bench, I am moving to withdraw as counsel
Brenda
Brenda 2025-09-19 09:18 p.m.
Npz_v, I believe you can represent yourself for the remainder of this case?
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-19 09:50 p.m.
@mantisshrimp69 ?
BrendaBrenda
@Kezzera @mantisshrimp69 Given my appointment to the bench, I am moving to withdraw as counsel
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 11:20 p.m.
Oh damn
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 11:23 p.m.
@Kezzera yes of course I’ll go pro se
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 11:23 p.m.
Could you quickly tell me where we are at with this case
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-19 11:23 p.m.
Since I am just returning to it
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-20 01:58 a.m.
We're considering your TRO, state made submissions
BrendaBrenda
@Kezzera @mantisshrimp69 Given my appointment to the bench, I am moving to withdraw as counsel
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-20 01:58 a.m.
I thought I entered order
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-20 01:59 a.m.
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that BrendaPopplewell, Esq. of Bennett, Ellis & Matlock LLC is withdrawn from this case. Accordingly, their representation for Plaintiff is terminated.

Signed
Albert Wellesley
Chief Judge
September 20, 2002
(edited)
KezzeraKezzera
We're considering your TRO, state made submissions
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-20 10:20 a.m.
Okay
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-20 10:20 a.m.
Can I have the TRO
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-20 12:34 p.m.
@Kezzera
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-20 07:11 p.m.
@mantisshrimp69 @meowiitten ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order be GRANTED. See attached for the [Order](https://drive.google.com/file/d/19DQLT_RznVwLzCjIblY0k6QJ_ORWZBax/view?usp=sharing).(edited)
KezzeraKezzera
@mantisshrimp69 @meowiitten ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order be GRANTED. See attached for the [Order](https://drive.g...(edited)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 11:05 a.m.
Thank you, your honor
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 11:05 a.m.
Now we ask the solicitor general be summoned and ordered to produce a responsive pleading within 7 days, pursuant to the rules
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 11:05 a.m.
I can provide a draft summons unless the bot is used
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-21 04:37 p.m.
state has appeared.. the fuck are you talking about?
KezzeraKezzera
state has appeared.. the fuck are you talking about?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 04:48 p.m.
to my knowledge they havent
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 04:48 p.m.
Theyve spoken in the chat but they havent waived summons or presented a notice of appearance
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 04:49 p.m.
Unless you'd like to correct me
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-21 04:53 p.m.
oh i swear they did hold on
KezzeraKezzera
oh i swear they did hold on
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 04:53 p.m.
if they did I retract
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 04:54 p.m.
their deadline will be earlier which is good for me
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 04:54 p.m.
But to my knowledge they didnt
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-21 05:44 p.m.
They appeared yesz
KezzeraKezzera
They appeared yesz
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 05:56 p.m.
Okay
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 05:57 p.m.
Do you know when?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 05:57 p.m.
They’d have 7 days from the date of waiving summons and appearing
clerkFlowBotclerkFlow
Click to see command.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-21 06:22 p.m.
.
KezzeraKezzera
.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 06:23 p.m.
That doesn’t count
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 06:23 p.m.
There wasn’t even a complaint
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 06:23 p.m.
They need to be summoned (or waive summons) after a duly submitted complaint
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-21 06:26 p.m.
You realize I'll have to reset this case back right
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-21 06:26 p.m.
that means your TRO is just gone too
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-21 06:27 p.m.
When he's just appeared here, willingly
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-21 06:27 p.m.
Are we really going to have an issue over this?
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-21 06:27 p.m.
It's your choice, I don't mind either way
KezzeraKezzera
You realize I'll have to reset this case back right
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 06:54 p.m.
no...you won't
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 06:54 p.m.
he appeared but not officially and he hasn't waived summons
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 06:54 p.m.
that's all acceptable, because we were at the TRO stage
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 06:54 p.m.
now that the TRO is granted, he can be summoned and given 7 days to produce a responsive pleading
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 06:54 p.m.
the reason I'm holding you to this is that this is procedurally required
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-21 07:03 p.m.
He's been summoned, he appeared here
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-21 07:03 p.m.
TRO runs parallel to this - his deadline began from the date he quite literally appeared in response to this lawsuit(edited)
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-21 07:04 p.m.
I'm happy to be shown otherwise?
KezzeraKezzera
He's been summoned, he appeared here
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:05 p.m.
he was not summoned
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:05 p.m.
summons requires a summons
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:05 p.m.
at the very least the command
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:05 p.m.
adding somebody to a channel allows them to speak but it is not a summons
KezzeraKezzera
TRO runs parallel to this - his deadline began from the date he quite literally appeared in response to this lawsuit(edited)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:06 p.m.
No, a deadline runs 7 days (in the case fo the government) from the date of issuance of a summons
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:06 p.m.
there was no summons
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:06 p.m.
and that's OKAY
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:07 p.m.
he shouldn't have been summoned before the TRO was disposed of because it's an emergency and requires ex parte review (unless the other party appears voluntarily to fight the TRO, but they still need to be summonsed unless they waive it)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:07 p.m.
all you need to do is /summon the SG
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 07:07 p.m.
then we wait 7 days that's it
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-21 09:27 p.m.
State literally appeared
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
No, a deadline runs 7 days (in the case fo the government) from the date of issuance of a summons
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-21 09:28 p.m.
Right, that's on you then
KezzeraKezzera used
/summon
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-09-21 09:28 p.m.
:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @k(edited)
Kezzera pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 02:58 p.m.
KezzeraKezzera
State literally appeared
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-21 09:30 p.m.
Didn’t waive summons
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 04:03 a.m.
Well it's on you
clerkFlowBotclerkFlow
:white_check_mark: Successfully summoned @k
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 04:04 a.m.
The clock starts from here, according to you
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
he shouldn't have been summoned before the TRO was disposed of because it's an emergency and requires ex parte review (unless the other party appears voluntarily to fight the TRO, ...
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 04:05 a.m.
To correct you on this - no, this was not ex parte
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 04:05 a.m.
State appeared quite literally as soon as they got wind of this
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 04:06 a.m.
and made representations
KezzeraKezzera
To correct you on this - no, this was not ex parte
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 08:24 a.m.
Because they appeared voluntarily to fight the TRO, but they still needed to be summonsed unless they waive it
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 08:24 a.m.
That is literally what I said
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 08:24 a.m.
It’s in the message being replied to
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 01:56 p.m.
I do not get you sometimes
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 02:00 p.m.
Your ability to being confidently wrong about personal jurisdiction and parallel processes astonishes me
😭2
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 02:02 p.m.
@k you need to use the /appear command to file NOAs now
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 02:08 p.m.
(figure it out yourself, I shouldn't have to explain this to you npz)
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-09-23 04:01 p.m.
(edited)
Appearance Request
Requester: @k
Party: Government
Channel: npz_v-v-senate-of-the-state-of-mayflower

A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
:⏳: Request expired.
Request ID: 29e490a9548f433a8a604be4ac3ec4b9
ApproveDeny
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 04:25 p.m.
@Kezzera
KezzeraKezzera
Your ability to being confidently wrong about personal jurisdiction and parallel processes astonishes me
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 04:27 p.m.
I’m not wrong about this, and I’d appreciate it if instead of insulting me purely for the memeworthiness you accepted it with grace when I point out flaws in the process
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 04:29 p.m.
In this case, I am a litigant, and you are the presiding judge. I’m being respectful and pointing out flaws I know are there—in response, you flagrantly insult me and refuse to acknowledge what I say to you only because I’m constructively criticizing you
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 04:30 p.m.
I should not have to weigh whether I want a future dismissal for insufficient service of process or facing the possibility of being undermined by random people in chatroom
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 04:31 p.m.
I reiterate I’ve been nothing but respectful since the beginning of this case and I expect the same from you. You are allowed to disagree with what I say, but even if I’m wrong, you should not speak to me that way
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 04:32 p.m.
Given the insightful conversations I’ve had with you in the past it is unpleasant to see you act in such a way and I hope you can see that
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-09-23 07:23 p.m.
@k appears for Government (approved by @Kezzera).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 02:58 p.m.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:23 p.m.
@k APPEARANCE ENTERED
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
Given the insightful conversations I’ve had with you in the past it is unpleasant to see you act in such a way and I hope you can see that
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:24 p.m.
I politely disagree
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:24 p.m.
I expect you to understand, yourself, the error
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:25 p.m.
You should understand it
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:25 p.m.
You are a member of this Court, and it is a standard for members of this Court to understand this process
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:26 p.m.
If you want to know where you are wrong, I invite you to message me directly about it
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:26 p.m.
I will not flood the record with it here
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-23 07:26 p.m.
I don’t believe I’ve made an error and I’ve justified my rationale, but whether or not I was correct is beyond the object of what I said
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:26 p.m.
I will not continue this conversation longer
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-23 07:27 p.m.
You can take it directly to me instead
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
Deverus
Deverus 2025-09-26 08:58 p.m.
Deverus
Deverus 2025-09-26 08:58 p.m.
cc: @mantisshrimp69
DeverusDeverus
Click to see attachment.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-26 09:39 p.m.
Thanks
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 11:35 p.m.
@Xerxy @Deverus @Kezzera I move for entry of default by the clerk (or, alternatively, by the court)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 11:35 p.m.
Further motion as to damages and whatnot will be filed within 24hrs
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-28 11:35 p.m.
Damages, affidavit all of that
Deverus
Deverus 2025-09-29 08:10 a.m.
ORDER: The Clerk for the Hon. AlbertWellesley, in accordance with the provisions under Mayfl. R. Civ. Pro. 37(a), enters default in the matter of npz_v vs. Mayfl. State Senate (CV-450-25). Judgement on damages reserved for the presiding judge, pending plaintiff's motion for default judgement to satisfy the requirements provided under Mayfl. R. Civ. Pro. 37(f).

Signed,
DeverusLazvari
Clerk
September 29 2002
cc: @mantisshrimp69 @k
(edited)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-29 12:52 p.m.
Thanks
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-29 08:29 p.m.
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT
https://drive.google.com/file/d/16Tp8gc9MrXqCHSbyBW2SJML0SAXavbU2/view?usp=sharing
Cc @Kezzera @Doogy
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT https://drive.google.com/file/d/16Tp8gc9MrXqCHSbyBW2SJML0SAXavbU2/view?usp=sh...
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-29 08:35 p.m.
Can we imagine it also asks for attorney’s fees (because Brenda charged me 125k case-wide before having to recuse)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-29 08:35 p.m.
I forgot to put it in
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-09-30 07:43 a.m.
Provide full context for that and I'll consider it. Follow this format

**Plaintiff's Motion for Awarding of Attorney Fees** Plaintiff requests this Court to consider and assess the awarding of Attorney Fees against Defendant, for the following reasons: 1. ... npz_v PLAINTIFF PRO SE
KezzeraKezzera
Provide full context for that and I'll consider it. Follow this format ``` Plaintiff's Motion for Awarding of Attorney Fees Plaintiff requests this Court to consider and asse...
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-30 01:14 p.m.
Plaintiff's Motion for Awarding of Attorney Fees

Plaintiff requests this Court to consider and assess the awarding of Attorney Fees against Defendant, for the following reasons:
1. My former attorney, BrendaPopplewell, charged me UC$125,000 to try this case.

npz_v
PLAINTIFF PRO SE
(edited)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-09-30 05:42 p.m.
@Kezzera can I have relief
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
Plaintiff's Motion for Awarding of Attorney Fees Plaintiff requests this Court to consider and assess the awarding of Attorney Fees against Defendant, for the following reason...(edited)
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-02 01:46 a.m.
You won't bother justifying this?
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-02 01:47 a.m.
Looking at your default pkg later
KezzeraKezzera
You won't bother justifying this?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 09:25 a.m.
I just did, I don’t know what you want me to say
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 10:47 a.m.
I had lawyer for this case
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 10:47 a.m.
She charged me $125k
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 10:47 a.m.
Had to recuse and I continued
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 10:48 a.m.
In total I spent $125k in atty’s fees
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-02 10:48 a.m.
So logically those are awarded
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-03 10:05 a.m.
@Kezzera your honor
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-03 11:56 p.m.
Hearing is scheduled for today on the show cause order(edited)
KezzeraKezzera
Hearing is scheduled for today on the show cause order(edited)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 05:12 a.m.
??
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 05:12 a.m.
What show cause order
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 06:58 a.m.
for the PI
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 06:58 a.m.
you didn't know?
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 06:59 a.m.
i mean state did appear initially for the tro, don't know where they're at right now
KezzeraKezzera
for the PI
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:06 a.m.
Oh
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:06 a.m.
That order to show cause
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:06 a.m.
Yes
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:06 a.m.
But like sir
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:06 a.m.
They’re in default
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:06 a.m.
Lmao
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:06 a.m.
They havent appeared at all
KezzeraKezzera
i mean state did appear initially for the tro, don't know where they're at right now
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:06 a.m.
They didn’t appear
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:07 a.m.
They were added to the channel informally and argued against it
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:07 a.m.
But they never appeared
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:07 a.m.
The court already entered default
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 07:07 a.m.
So can you rule on relief? It’s been a week(edited)
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:50 a.m.
well, they have today..
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-04 07:50 a.m.
(edited)
Appearance Request
Requester: @actxrz
Party: defendant
Channel: npz_v-v-senate-of-the-state-of-mayflower

A Magistrate Judge or higher may approve or deny below.
Status
:⏳: Request expired.
Request ID: d51e7a405b07443aa85fc895046cee47
ApproveDeny
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-04 07:50 a.m.
@actxrz appears for defendant (approved by @Kezzera).
judicialFLOW pinned a message to this channel.2026-01-18 02:58 p.m.
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.
hi
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.
Hello
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.
i assume you are quite busy chasing up these cases
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.
AG kind of left this one in the dust, default has been entered
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.
could i get a quick summary on what’s due and any hearings
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.
oh
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.
awkwardly we have a PI show cause hearing today
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.
when default is entered
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:51 a.m.
plaintiff has submitted package also requesting the TRO convert to a PI
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.
but i'll likely need some evidence and so forth usually
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.
I already have materials from him
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.
today is the hearing?
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.
i need to know why you guys have failed to follow up with this
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.
yes, today
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.
ehh idk if i’m available
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.
it's the last day before you guys fail to appear for that
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.
nothing in-game, discord only
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.
my computer isnt here yet
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-04 07:52 a.m.
i have work from 10-8
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:53 a.m.
well, i don't know then
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:53 a.m.
you guys have defaulted already
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:53 a.m.
this is over an arrest warrant issued by the senate
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:53 a.m.
you're free to discuss with plaintiff about it outside here if you wish?
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:54 a.m.
either you mutually agree to an extended time, but i warn that the order will likely be extended if plaintiff applies
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:54 a.m.
i will consider the rest of his requests
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-04 07:54 a.m.
alright could we possibly reschedule the hearing? if not you guys will probably waiting till like 10 or 11 pm for a response
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:54 a.m.
are you aware of what this case is concerning
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-04 07:54 a.m.
@mantisshrimp69
KezzeraKezzera
are you aware of what this case is concerning
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-04 07:54 a.m.
not really
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:54 a.m.
it's about anakin issuing a warrant of arrest against npz
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-04 07:55 a.m.
for
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:55 a.m.
senate authority was relied upon this
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:55 a.m.
uh, failure to appear at a senate hearing from what i remember
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:55 a.m.
i've temporarily stopped it from taking effect
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:55 a.m.
for about two weeks
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:55 a.m.
we're on the final day of those two weeks
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:56 a.m.
AG has sent in no response to the complaint, you'll see my back and forth about the process above
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:56 a.m.
and plaintiff filed a default
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:56 a.m.
clerk has entered it
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:56 a.m.
so now we're here
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:57 a.m.
AG, then SG, got the summons papers
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-04 07:57 a.m.
previous ones?
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:57 a.m.
xolaaz yes
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-04 07:57 a.m.
mkay
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:57 a.m.
he's in this chat too
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-04 07:57 a.m.
oh
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-04 07:57 a.m.
before or after default was entered
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:58 a.m.
before default
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-04 07:58 a.m.
err
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:58 a.m.
so i expected something but
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:58 a.m.
i got nothing
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:58 a.m.
no new appearance requests anywhere
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:58 a.m.
that's where we are at with this
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:58 a.m.
i understand the situation is a bit awkward procedurally, i hadn't noticed it
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:59 a.m.
but it's workable
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:59 a.m.
either both of you agree to a time in the next hour or so, or i will tell you all when to submit arguments, if any
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:59 a.m.
it'll be over discord so you'll get a day to respond
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 07:59 a.m.
the chat has all the papers available
KezzeraKezzera
it's the last day before you guys fail to appear for that
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:32 a.m.
Excuse me
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:33 a.m.
You don’t enter default against the defendant for a week and the moment they appear weeks later you restart the case
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:33 a.m.
He cannot appear anymore
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:33 a.m.
He’s in default
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:33 a.m.
This is not fair for me
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:34 a.m.
Plus you’re essentially telling the state what to do
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:38 a.m.
There is NO OSC because they’re in default
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:38 a.m.
You extend the TRO and make it permanent
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:40 a.m.
Do you want me to put all this in a motion for what I think you should do?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 09:40 a.m.
@Kezzera
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:35 p.m.
No?
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:36 p.m.
You can cost your entire case with this sass though
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:36 p.m.
Sass
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:36 p.m.
?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:36 p.m.
What sass
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:36 p.m.
The state defaulted, they didn’t appear for two weeks, and you refused to grant me relief at every turn, but now that the state appears ages late you suddenly work at the speed of light
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.
They’re already in default
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.
Did both of you have any discussion about this case
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.
Hey
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.
No
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.
Listen
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.
I didn't deny relief
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.
I've noticed the TRO
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.
There's a show cause
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.
I need to know what's up with them
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.
When there’s a TRO and the defendant defaults, the TRO is converted into a permanent injunction
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:37 p.m.
The OSC is terminated
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.
That’s common sense
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.
If they don't bother today then it's full relief
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.
That’s not how it works though
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.
Am I supposed to automatically grant you permanent injunctions?
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.
Show me
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.
If the defendant doesn’t appear….
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.
Yes…
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.
Show me
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.
That’s what default is…
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.
Show you what
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.
Show me
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:38 p.m.
Where's the authority
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:39 p.m.
That says I must
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:40 p.m.
You’re asking me to show you why the defendant doesn’t get a chance to respond when he defaults
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:40 p.m.
The only authority I need is the definition of default judgment
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:40 p.m.
I'm asking you for authority which requires me to grant you permanent injunction automatically on default judgment
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:42 p.m.
Ok Im with friends rn I’ll file motion today
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:42 p.m.
Is that ok
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:43 p.m.
Until then I’d appreciate it if we stayed the post-default OSC or anything else of that sort
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:46 p.m.
You understand that you will likely face that warrant if I rescheduled the show cause hearing
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:46 p.m.
@mantisshrimp69
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:47 p.m.
The TRO expires after today(edited)
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:47 p.m.
If I allowed you both to instead make submissions within one day starting now that can be avoided
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:50 p.m.
e360 v Spamhaus, 500 F.3d 594, 604 (7th Cir. 2007) for my authority supporting the view that an automatic grant is not required(edited)
KezzeraKezzera
You understand that you will likely face that warrant if I rescheduled the show cause hearing
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 03:51 p.m.
Keep the TRO until then
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:51 p.m.
I'll just open session now
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:57 p.m.
@mantisshrimp69 @actxrz We're now in open session - show cause hearing begins for a PI begins from here.

Instructions
1. Each party will submit their complete arguments here. Plaintiff will get 24 hours from now, and then Defendant will get 24 hours after Plaintiff makes their arguments.
2. Arguments must be at most 1-3 messages, in block text which contains the entire argument. No further allowance except with leave of court.

* The TRO is extended for an additional 48 hours.
* There is an entry of default for this case. You need to be aware of the consequences of that default if you are affected by it.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:57 p.m.
Remote means, no in-game
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 03:58 p.m.
No motions will be accepted at this point. That opportunity has now passed. Motions that can be accepted must be in relation to the default package submitted earlier.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 04:13 p.m.
An OSC is simply not proper
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-04 04:13 p.m.
What will the PI extend throughout if the proceedings are already over because default was entered?
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 11:52 p.m.
So
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 11:53 p.m.
The PI, if granted, would then allow me to grant injunctive relief you requested on default
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-04 11:53 p.m.
That's the purpose of it now(edited)
KezzeraKezzera
So
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 07:03 a.m.
Ok here’s my justification
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 07:04 a.m.
The senate, as the court already decided, had no authority to issue a warrant for my arrest in this setting. If I’m arrested, I risk a violation of my rights.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 07:04 a.m.
There
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 08:05 a.m.
It still baffles me that this OSC is still active
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 08:05 a.m.
Because default means that the defendant didn’t appear and all relief is granted automatically
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 08:06 a.m.
So why does he get another chance to appear just to rebut some part of the relief
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-05 08:06 a.m.
It’s dumb and it’s not how it’s done
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-05 11:21 a.m.
You may raise this on appeal if you really wish
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-05 11:21 a.m.
But I'm covering every single literal ground when I do this
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
The senate, as the court already decided, had no authority to issue a warrant for my arrest in this setting. If I’m arrested, I risk a violation of my rights.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-05 11:23 a.m.
4 months ago or Monday, October 6, 2025 at 7:03 a.m. @actxrz < response due by this time
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
The senate, as the court already decided, had no authority to issue a warrant for my arrest in this setting. If I’m arrested, I risk a violation of my rights.
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-05 11:23 a.m.
js to this right
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-05 11:23 a.m.
aye
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-05 11:23 a.m.
im not responding to the other stuff
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-05 11:23 a.m.
No, just to the thing I replied to
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-05 11:23 a.m.
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-05 11:23 a.m.
@mantisshrimp69
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-05 11:24 a.m.
You sent me my own SO
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-05 11:24 a.m.
oh
KezzeraKezzera
No, just to the thing I replied to
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-05 11:24 a.m.
understood, thank you
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-05 11:25 a.m.
Of course
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-05 07:36 p.m.
@Kezzera ok we are settling
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:13 a.m.
okay, need terms outlined here unless confidential?
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:13 a.m.
@actxrz
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:13 a.m.
if confidential, why it must be
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-06 05:48 a.m.
no ifs not
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-06 05:48 a.m.
it’s*
KezzeraKezzera
okay, need terms outlined here unless confidential?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 06:07 a.m.
Ill send
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 06:08 a.m.
Cus court has jurisdiction to enforce
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 06:08 a.m.
But you shouldn’t require that for settlements
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 06:08 a.m.
Parties aren’t required to have the court approve it
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 06:08 a.m.
That’s for consent judgments which are needed only in special cases
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 06:22 a.m.
Please check your DMs @Kezzera
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:30 p.m.
I don't know why you jump straight to the conclusion im wanting the terms so I can approve it(edited)
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:30 p.m.
If I need to approve it I will explicitly tell you that(edited)
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:31 p.m.
I don't know why you tell me how to do my job
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:32 p.m.
I know when I need to approve it, if I have discretion to impose such a requirement or just never require court approval for a particular settlement
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:33 p.m.
It's pissing me off, stop
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:33 p.m.
You don't have to remind me when and how to deal with certain legal matters
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:34 p.m.
Litigants usually note these for appeal or some corrective process, not correct them on the spot. You look like a smartass doing that. No one likes it
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:34 p.m.
This is the fucking problem honestly
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:35 p.m.
Let me get shit wrong, let me fix it, and if I never fix it then you'll get your chance to
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:38 p.m.
if you are making a mistake in logic or law before ruling it's my diligent duty (or would be if I wasn't pro se) to tell you
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:38 p.m.
lawyers are there to make legal arguments
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:38 p.m.
YOU NOTE IT DOWN.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:38 p.m.
YOU RESPECTFULLY SUGGEST CORRECTION WHEN ITS INVITED.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:38 p.m.
THAT IS THE FIRST THING YOU SHOULD HAVE FUCKING LEARNED.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:39 p.m.
IM TIRED OF YOU DOING THIS SHIT FOUR HUNDRED FUCKING TIMES.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:39 p.m.
STOP.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:40 p.m.
I have been extremely patient with you despite your complete confidence in being wrong on certain occasions, where you insist on not even hearing me out on how you are or might be wrong
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:40 p.m.
And then just insist you're right
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:40 p.m.
You treat me like I'm a fucking retard
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:40 p.m.
It's fucking demeaning
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:40 p.m.
Cut it
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:41 p.m.
I respectfully disagree, I think I've been respectful of the court and all parties
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:41 p.m.
I understand not wanting correction when a decision is alreaady made
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:41 p.m.
You're not listening
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:41 p.m.
But when it isn't it is fundamentally a lawyer's job to make arguments
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:42 p.m.
A lawyers job is to advocate for the best legal interests of their client
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:42 p.m.
Not to hurl everything at the court
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:42 p.m.
There's humility to the art of advocacy
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:42 p.m.
and there's human too
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:42 p.m.
Know when to read the room
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:43 p.m.
A simple acknowledgement would suffice and a copy of the terms
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:43 p.m.
so I can put it on the record, or not
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:43 p.m.
your choice
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:43 p.m.
and state as well
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:44 p.m.
And a voluntary dismissal notice
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:44 p.m.
Since this is being settled
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:44 p.m.
you said I had to send it unless it was confidential
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:44 p.m.
and to justify why it was confidential if it was
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:44 p.m.
I asked state
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:44 p.m.
They said it wasn't
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:44 p.m.
Are you willing to give me the terms or no
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:47 p.m.
Yes, because it stipulates continued court jurisdiction over its enforcement
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:47 p.m.
so I kind of have to
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:47 p.m.
Yes!!
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:47 p.m.
So please give me a copy so it would be easier for everyone!!
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-06 03:47 p.m.
yes I will once it's signed
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:47 p.m.
# PLEASE.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-06 03:47 p.m.
Thank you
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-11 01:17 a.m.
I'd like some movement in this case please
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-11 01:24 a.m.
@actxrz @mantisshrimp69
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-11 01:25 a.m.
What's going on? Has a settlement/stipulation/etc (whatever you want to call it) been signed yet? Where's the voluntary dismissal?
KezzeraKezzera
What's going on? Has a settlement/stipulation/etc (whatever you want to call it) been signed yet? Where's the voluntary dismissal?
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-11 07:51 a.m.
Working on it
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-11 12:51 p.m.
Okay
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 08:38 p.m.
@Kezzera we have touchdown
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 08:39 p.m.
And a signed agreement
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 Server2025-10-12 08:39 p.m.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 08:39 p.m.
The paper is technically not signed yet bc I have to go into word and edit it in
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 08:39 p.m.
But I will do that soon
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-12 08:39 p.m.
It’s signed tho
mantisshrimp69mantisshrimp69
It’s signed tho
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-13 12:28 p.m.
@actxrz Has it been signed
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-13 12:28 p.m.
yes
actxrz
actxrz 2025-10-13 12:28 p.m.
its been signed
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-13 12:28 p.m.
Ok
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-13 12:28 p.m.
Give me the signed copy when ready so I can enter it later but you can now go ahead and submit me your voluntary dismissal notice @mantisshrimp69
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-13 12:30 p.m.
Will the warrant cease to have full effect permanently then
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-13 12:30 p.m.
(I'm aware it's alive at the moment)
KezzeraKezzera
Give me the signed copy when ready so I can enter it later but you can now go ahead and submit me your voluntary dismissal notice @mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-13 12:53 p.m.
I hereby stipulate for voluntary dismissal of this case with prejudice, pursuant to my settlement agreement with Defendants.
-# npz_v
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-13 04:49 p.m.
NOTICE: Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Stipulation between Parties is noted. Action is to be terminated October 14 2002. Dismissed with prejudice. No costs. Clerk is directed to take notice and await further directions from this Court to close this case channel.(edited)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-13 05:00 p.m.
@Kezzera you’re not archiving right
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-13 05:00 p.m.
Cus the agreement says u can enforce
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-13 05:00 p.m.
The contract
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-14 05:14 a.m.
i know
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-14 05:14 a.m.
give me the fully signed agreement so i can enter it
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-14 05:14 a.m.
you open a new case when you need to enforce it
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-14 05:15 a.m.
we'll have the details here ready to refer back to
KezzeraKezzera
you open a new case when you need to enforce it
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-14 06:10 a.m.
That doesn’t seem efficient
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-14 06:10 a.m.
Cant we just keep this open
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-14 10:31 a.m.
No
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-14 10:32 a.m.
Why would I care if you think it's inefficient
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-14 10:32 a.m.
I will not keep open a case chat if nothing is likely going to happen
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-14 10:32 a.m.
after this case
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-14 10:33 a.m.
As far as I know, it's over, and if any issues arise you can file a new case - we're going to find the records of this case if it is necessary(edited)
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-14 12:59 p.m.
Okay
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 05:42 p.m.
mantisshrimp69
mantisshrimp69 2025-10-19 05:42 p.m.
@Kezzera
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-21 06:24 p.m.
@Kezzera please upload attachments for npz_v v. Senate of the State of Mayflower now. You can send multiple messages. Type done when finished.
Allowed types: application/pdf, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text/plain
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-21 06:24 p.m.
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-21 06:24 p.m.
@Kezzera accepted 1 file(s). (Total: 1/5)
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-21 06:24 p.m.
@Kezzera You can upload 4 more — or type done.
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-21 06:25 p.m.
done
UserUser
Message could not be loaded.
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-21 06:25 p.m.
Uploaded 1/1 file(s).
Kezzera
Kezzera 2025-10-21 07:09 p.m.
Clerk directed to close case
DeverusDeverus used
/transcript
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-23 05:54 a.m.
Creating transcript..
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-23 05:54 a.m.
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-25 06:59 p.m.
@Deverus please upload attachments for npz_v v. Senate of the State of Mayflower now. You can send multiple messages. Type done when finished.
Allowed types: application/pdf, image/jpeg, image/png, image/webp, text/plain
Deverus
Deverus 2025-10-25 06:59 p.m.
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-25 06:59 p.m.
@Deverus rejected (unsupported type): npz_v-vs-mayfl-state-senate-transcript.html
judicialFLOW
judicialFLOW Bot2025-10-25 06:59 p.m.
@Deverus You can upload 5 more — or type done.
Deverus
Deverus 2025-10-25 06:59 p.m.
done
Deverus
Deverus 2025-10-25 06:59 p.m.
oh. ok then.
Deverus
Deverus 2025-10-25 06:59 p.m.
done
Deverus
Deverus 2025-10-25 06:59 p.m.
no transcripts on the trello then ig
clerkFlow
clerkFlow Bot2025-10-25 07:01 p.m.
Channel Permissions Synced
Permissions have been synced to Volume XIII.
Exported 620 messages